But we cannot talk of two infinite polytope families (the orthoplexes and the simplexes) without talking about the third infinite polytope family: the n-cubes. It's just that, well, in the context of polytopic algebras, n-cubes are a bit more special, and it's taken me much longer to figure out how they fit in our puzzle.
So, how do we go about constructing groups whose convex hulls are n-cubes? Do such groups even exist in \(\mathbb{X}_n\)?
Of course, we know that a 1-cube exists in \(\mathbb{X}_1\). That's just a line segment (same as the 1-orthoplex and the 1-simplex) and is thus covered by \(\{1,-1\}\), a cyclic group of order two.
In two dimensions, we have the happy coincidence that the 2-cube is the same as the 2-orthoplex (a square), and is covered by the 2-orthoplexic group \(\{1,i,-1,-i\}\), which is a cyclic group of order four in \(\mathbb{X}_2\).
The 3-cubic group
Things get a little interesting in \(\mathbb{X}_3\), as the cube is not a convex hull of any cyclic group there. Instead, we need to realize another coincidence: the 3-simplex is the demicube, and so we can take the union of the 3-simplexic group in \(\mathbb{X}_3\) and the additive inverses of its elements and come up with a cube. Luckily, this superset is also a group. Not a cyclic group, but still a finite abelian group. If you look closely enough, you'll notice that this cubic group is isomorphic to the direct product of cyclic groups \(C_2\times{C_4}\).
Incidentally, \(\mathbb{X}_3\) itself is also a direct product, specifically it is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{X}_1\times\mathbb{X}_2\cong\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}\). We know this because the basis group of \(\mathbb{X}_3\) makes it isomorphic to the group algebra \(\mathbb{R}[C_3]\), and it is known that \(\mathbb{R}[C_n]\cong\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{(n-1)/2}\) when n is an odd number.
So clearly it makes sense to define polytopic groups to include other finitely-generated multiplicative abelian groups in an algebra, not just cyclic groups in an algebra.
The 4-cubic group
We've already seen that the \(C_2\) in \(\mathbb{X}_1\), the \(C_4\) in \(\mathbb{X}_2\), and the \(C_2\times{C_4}\) in \(\mathbb{X_1}\times\mathbb{X_2}\) coincidentally all form n-cubes. So, where is the next n-cube? Specifically, where is the 4-cube/tesseract in \(\mathbb{X}_4\)?
Since the 4-orthoplexic group in \(\mathbb{X}_4\) is generated by a fourth root of negative one, it is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{R}[X]/(X^4+1)\cong\mathbb{X}_2\times\mathbb{X}_2\). Given the relations between cyclic groups and algebras described above, \(\mathbb{X}_2\times\mathbb{X}_2\) suggests that we look for a group isomorphic to \(C_4\times{C_4}\) in \(\mathbb{X}_4\) and see if it is a 4-cube.
In order to do this more simply and elegantly, we can use an orthonormal basis different from the 4-orthoplexic group. You see, there is another algebra isomorphic to \(\mathbb{X}_2\times\mathbb{X}_2\): The tessarines. The basis elements used in the tessarines are denoted \(\{1,i,j,k\) where \(i^2=k^2=-1,i^2=1,ij=k\).
Given the \(\mathbb{X}_4\) basis \(\{1,\chi_4,\chi_4^2,\chi_4^3\}\) (more on this notation here), we have the following mappings from the orthoplexic basis to the Tessarine basis:
\[i=\chi_4^2\]
\[j=\frac{\chi_4-\chi_4^3}{\sqrt{2}}\]
\[k=\frac{\chi_4+\chi_4^3}{\sqrt{2}}\]
In the Tessarine basis, the following is a group isomorphic to \(C_4\times{C_4}\):
\[\{\pm 1,\pm i,\pm j,\pm k, \pm(\frac{1+i+j-k}{2}), \pm(\frac{1+i-j+k}{2}), \pm(\frac{1-i+j+k}{2}), \pm(\frac{-1+i+j+k}{2})\}\]
These sixteen group elements form the vertices of the 4-cube that we're looking for. Since \(\mathbb{X}_4\) is isomorphic to the tessarines, we know that this 4-cube exists there as well.
The n-cube conjecture
In any polytopic algebra \(\mathbb{X}_n\), there is an abelian group \(\Gamma_n\) under multiplication that's defined by the following relations:
\[\Gamma_2\cong{C_4}\text{ (cyclic)}\]
\[\Gamma_n\cong\begin{cases}
C_2\times{C_4^{m}}, & \text{if $n=2m+1$ (odd)} \\
C_4^{m}, & \text{if $n=2m$ (even)}
\end{cases},\forall{m\in\mathbb{N}}\]
Here's a conjecture: In any \(\mathbb{X}_n\), the convex hull of \(\Gamma_n\) is an n-cube.
No comments:
Post a Comment